John Hickner, Editor of The Journal of Family Medicine, in his July 23 editorial, takes issue with the more and more prevalent opinion that chronic disease management is the core of Family Medicine:
http://www.jfponline.com/Pages.asp?AID=11501&issue=July_2013&UID= |
Shouldn’t Family Doctors Treat Acute Illnesses?
2 Comments to “Shouldn’t Family Doctors Treat Acute Illnesses?”
-
I apologize if I should have contacted you about this a different way, but I don’t see a “contact me” feature to your blog so I thought I’d put it in a comment. (Please feel free to edit this comment or to contact me privately and tell me how to do differently in the future. Today I was alerted to this (http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/08/05/study_reveals_doctors_are_spending_even_less_time_with_patients.html ) by the author’s blog feed. I would love to hear you comment on the article. Thanks.
-
Chronic disease management is of course the core of family medicine – it’s what I do at least 60% of my working day. The rest is acute care, ER, prenatal, delivery and postpartum care, anaesthesia, surgical assisting, palliative care, nursing home visits (acute and chronic), etc. Ongoing care of chronic illness is our schtick – acute care of many common illnesses and as many add-ons as we wish to enjoy we make us ‘full service’ (or your favourite moniker) FPs.